<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post5827655037272545915..comments</id><updated>2007-09-11T09:56:36.016-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Vegas Watch: Evaluating October Closers</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://vegaswatch.net/feeds/5827655037272545915/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html'/><author><name>Vegas Watch</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02353166004125421683</uri><email>vegaswatch@gmail.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-4265072484505423102</id><published>2007-09-11T06:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-11T06:55:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Nice post, man.  Who do you think the best of the ...</title><content type='html'>Nice post, man.  Who do you think the best of the elite has been this year?  I think Putz, Papelbon and Saito have clearly been the top three.  Cordero got off to a great start but has slowed quite a bit in the 2nd half.  Meanwhile, Rivera only has 24 saves for the season, which isn't enough for him to be the best.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It's a shame because it seems that only Papelbon's team will make it to October out of those three.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I've been reading your blog for awhile, and enjoy the content.  I have added your blog to my list of links for my own blog, The Sports Lounge, which is at dailysportsinfo.blogspot.com  I was wondering if you could do the same.  Thanks, and keep up the good work.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/4265072484505423102'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/4265072484505423102'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html?showComment=1189508100000#c4265072484505423102' title=''/><author><name>Neil Joshi</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07997652987881028651</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-5827655037272545915' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/posts/default/5827655037272545915' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-2767495054441732181</id><published>2007-09-10T16:22:58.599-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-10T16:22:58.599-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Although this seems weird at first, it actually ma...</title><content type='html'>Although this seems weird at first, it actually makes sense.  It's pretty widely accepted that the best way to predict a pitcher's future performance is to look at what he can control independent of his fielders- walks, strikeouts, and home runs.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;This analysis ignores home runs, because for closers who only pitch about 60 innings per season, that's not a large enough sample to really be meaningful in showing how good they are at preventing the longball.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/2767495054441732181'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/2767495054441732181'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html?showComment=1189455778599#c2767495054441732181' title=''/><author><name>Vegas Watch</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02353166004125421683</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07772761526988251085'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-5827655037272545915' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/posts/default/5827655037272545915' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-9065497925988428917</id><published>2007-09-10T16:04:02.716-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-10T16:04:02.716-04:00</updated><title type='text'>In looking at closers over the last six years, I f...</title><content type='html'>In looking at closers over the last six years, I found that the only things that are particularly useful in predicting future save percentage are BB/9 and K/9.  This is true for any month.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/9065497925988428917'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/9065497925988428917'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html?showComment=1189454642716#c9065497925988428917' title=''/><author><name>Vegas Watch</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02353166004125421683</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07772761526988251085'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-5827655037272545915' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/posts/default/5827655037272545915' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-373850025247772210</id><published>2007-09-10T14:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-10T14:20:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Do strikeouts count as two outs or something in Se...</title><content type='html'>Do strikeouts count as two outs or something in September? I wasn't aware tons of K's was a closer prerequisite.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/373850025247772210'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/5827655037272545915/comments/default/373850025247772210'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html?showComment=1189448400000#c373850025247772210' title=''/><author><name>Suss</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06455887435216537299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://vegaswatch.net/2007/09/evaluating-october-closers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965585998403674176.post-5827655037272545915' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7965585998403674176/posts/default/5827655037272545915' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>